Coty Inc. (COTY) — ESG & Values Scores

Environment story

Coty Inc. demonstrates weak environmental disclosure and governance. Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions data are entirely absent from the 10-K filing, triggering full deductions under the deterministic rubric. No net-zero target year is disclosed, resulting in an additional penalty. The company acknowledges sustainability priorities and responsible sourcing goals (palm oil, mica, conflict minerals compliance under Dodd-Frank), but these represent reputational management rather than quantified decarbonization infrastructure. The 10-K extensively discusses supply-chain sustainability challenges—inflationary pressures on raw materials, glass/resin cost volatility, and constraints on responsibly sourced inputs—but provides no evidence of physical decarbonization investment. Environmental risk disclosures focus on regulatory compliance and reputational risk, not operational carbon reduction. Greenwashing flags: company states commitment to 'environmental sustainability' and 'corporate citizenship' but offers zero metrics to verify actual emissions reductions or renewable energy adoption.

Criticisms on file

No disclosed Scope 1, 2, or 3 greenhouse gas emissions data; no net-zero target year; no quantified renewable energy percentage.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, MD&A and Risk Factors sections
Supply-chain emissions exposure: company acknowledges dependence on third-party suppliers and global manufacturing; inflationary pressures on energy-intensive materials (glass, chemicals, resins) noted, but no decarbonization action plan disclosed.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'A disruption in operations could adversely affect our business'
Environmental litigation risk mentioned: company is subject to legal proceedings including talc-related litigation alleging bodily injury, though not framed as environmental.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'We are subject to legal proceedings and legal compliance risks, including talc-related litigation alleging bodily injury'

Disclosed initiatives

Responsible Sourcing Program

Company states commitment to responsible sourcing of palm oil, mica, and conflict-free minerals (Dodd-Frank compliance). Acknowledges supply-chain audits and verification of material origins.

Reputational management; no quantified environmental benefit disclosed.
Packaging Sustainability

10-K mentions 'packaging and environmental sustainability' as part of corporate citizenship efforts, but no specific targets, timelines, or material reduction data provided.
Supply Chain Resilience

Company notes efforts to manage raw material sustainability constraints and optimize sourcing to address inflationary pressures and supply-chain disruptions.

No decarbonization benefit quantified.

Social story

Coty Inc. presents mixed social performance with significant governance and labor-relation risks. CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio is undisclosed, preventing direct assessment against the 200:1 threshold. Leadership diversity data are absent from the 10-K, triggering a 15-point deduction under the deterministic rubric. Turnover is acknowledged as 'increasingly competitive labor market' with 'increased employee turnover' during fiscal 2024, but no quantified turnover rate is provided. Union standing is neutral to slightly negative: the company acknowledges works council arrangements in Europe (creating litigation exposure) and general employment-related claim risks, but does not disclose union-suppression activities or active strikes within 24 months. Supply-chain ethics: company acknowledges Dodd-Frank conflict minerals obligations and responsible sourcing commitments, but no detailed human-rights audit or living-wage commitment is disclosed. Diversity initiatives are referenced generically ('corporate citizenship') but without EEO-1 disclosure, HRC CEI score, or pay-equity data. The company's extensive discussion of employment litigation risk (discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, wage violations) suggests elevated social compliance exposure.

Criticisms on file

No disclosed CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio, leadership diversity percentages (women/URM in executive/board roles), or turnover rate quantification.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, MD&A and Risk Factors
Elevated employment litigation exposure: company explicitly states risk of 'discrimination, harassment (sexual or otherwise), wrongful termination or retaliation, local, state, federal and non-U.S. labor law violations, injury, and wage violations'.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'Our success depends, in part, on our employees, including our key personnel'
Works council arrangements in Europe create additional dispute and litigation risk, though not framed as union suppression.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'our employees in certain countries in Europe are subject to works council arrangements'
Supply-chain human-rights audit scope not disclosed; company acknowledges risk of third-party supplier non-compliance with labor/ethical standards but does not publish audit results.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'failure by our third-party suppliers to comply with ethical, social, product, labor and environmental laws'

Disclosed initiatives

Conflict Minerals Compliance

Company subject to Dodd-Frank reporting requirements for Democratic Republic of Congo-origin minerals; maintains procedures to identify conflict-free sources.

Compliance-driven; no quantified impact on supply-chain ethics improvement.
Responsible Sourcing and Labor Standards

10-K states commitment to compliance with 'ethical, social, product, labor and environmental standards' and acknowledges third-party supplier audits; specifies risk of non-compliance by suppliers.

Framework in place; enforcement and scope undisclosed.
Employment Policies and Anti-Harassment Standards

Company discloses policies against harassment (sexual or otherwise) and general employment compliance; acknowledges litigation risk and mitigation efforts.

Policies stated; litigation outcome data not provided.

Governance story

Coty Inc. exhibits significant governance weaknesses, primarily driven by a dual-class share structure with concentrated JAB Beauty control and exemptions from NYSE corporate governance requirements. The company explicitly discloses that JAB Holding and affiliates own approximately 54% of Class A Common Stock, granting them unilateral control over major decisions. Coty qualifies as a 'controlled company' under NYSE rules and relies on exemptions from governance requirements designed to protect non-controlled shareholders. Board independence percentage is not disclosed in the 10-K, preventing direct assessment; however, the controlled-company structure inherently compromises independence. Lobbying expenditures are not disclosed. Regulatory and legal proceedings risk is significant: the company faces talc litigation (reputational and financial exposure), IP infringement risks, and general regulatory compliance challenges, but no current material antitrust, consumer-safety, or financial-fraud proceedings are detailed. The company's dual-class structure and controlled-company status result in a 20-point deduction per the rubric. No evidence of shareholder activism or climate-proposal litigation is disclosed, preventing Checklist A greenwashing-litigation deduction, but the controlled structure limits shareholder oversight effectiveness.

Criticisms on file

Dual-class share structure with JAB Beauty ownership of ~54% of Class A Common Stock, providing them effective control over shareholder decisions.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'JAB Beauty B.V. (JAB) and its affiliates, through their ownership of approximately 54% of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock, have the ability to effect and/or significantly influence certain decisions requiring stockholder approval'
Controlled-company status: Coty relies on NYSE governance exemptions and does not maintain full board independence, audit committee, compensation committee, or nominating committee independence required of non-controlled companies.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'We are a controlled company within the meaning of the NYSE rules and, as a result, are entitled to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements'
Talc-related litigation alleging bodily injury: company explicitly lists this as a material legal proceeding and risk factor, but quantification and status are not detailed in 10-K.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'We are subject to legal proceedings and legal compliance risks, including talc-related litigation alleging bodily injury'
Intellectual property litigation and enforcement: company conducts numerous IP infringement actions annually; risk of costly litigation, reputation damage, and IP invalidation disclosed.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'If we are unable to obtain, maintain and protect our intellectual property rights' and 'To protect or enforce our intellectual property and other proprietary rights, we may initiate litigation'
AI and data privacy regulatory uncertainty: company acknowledges rapid evolution of AI regulation (EU AI Act, emerging state/national frameworks) and associated compliance cost and operational-limitation risks.
Source: COTY_10k.txt, Risk Factors: 'We use AI in our business, and challenges with properly managing its use could result in harm to our brands'

Disclosed initiatives

Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Compliance

Company acknowledges GDPR, UK data protection, Brazilian LGPD, China regulations, and emerging AI governance requirements; states commitment to adapting operations and IT systems to comply.

Defensive compliance; no proactive governance enhancement disclosed.
AI Governance Framework

Company acknowledges use of AI in business operations and risks of bias, accuracy, and regulatory uncertainty; identifies need for adequate safeguards and resources.

Risk acknowledged; governance framework not detailed.
Anti-Counterfeiting and Brand Enforcement Program

Company maintains robust anti-counterfeiting program and brings numerous infringement suits annually; aims to protect IP and brand value.

Litigation-based enforcement; proactive governance value uncertain.

These are Missionomics' own editorial scores — directional signals built from disclosed facts under a published method, not certifications or definitive ratings of Coty Inc.. Coverage and confidence vary by data point, and figures can lag real-world changes. Read the full Methodology for sourcing, scoring, and correction details — or open Coty Inc. in the app for interactive charts and portfolio building.

More in Consumer Defensive

US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) Performance Food Group Co (PFGC) Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ) Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH)