Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA)

Environment story

Zebra demonstrates moderate environmental performance with significant gaps in disclosed emissions data and net-zero commitments. Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions figures are not disclosed in filed documents, triggering a 15-point penalty. No explicit net-zero target year is disclosed (penalty: 15 points). The company has not publicly documented material investments in physical decarbonization infrastructure. Risk factor disclosures acknowledge regulatory pressures from climate change legislation and ESG requirements but do not detail mitigation actions. The company acknowledges evolving regulatory obligations under the EU AI Act and other emerging climate frameworks, suggesting reactive rather than proactive environmental positioning. No significant toxic waste, water, or habitat controversies are disclosed in the 10-K or proxy, limiting additional penalties. Overall, Zebra's environmental profile reflects insufficient transparency and commitment relative to peer expectations in the technology/manufacturing sector.

Social story

Zebra's social performance reflects moderate practices with notable gaps in diversity and pay equity disclosure. CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio is not disclosed, preventing precise assessment but assumed elevated given scale. Leadership diversity metrics are not fully disclosed; the company acknowledges efforts to add diverse directors (five independent directors added since 2020, including Mary McDowell in July 2025) but does not provide workforce or executive-level gender/URG representation percentages. No active documented union-suppression activities or major strikes are disclosed; however, the 10-K risk factor explicitly lists 'union organizing efforts' as a management challenge and cost-control concern. Supply-chain human-rights audits are not detailed; the company references supplier code of conduct compliance requirements but does not disclose audit results or evidence of conflict minerals or forced-labor remediation. Turnover and plant safety data are not disclosed. Overall, Zebra lacks transparent, detailed social metrics expected by institutional investors and scores below sector leaders on diversity and pay equity disclosure.

Governance story

Zebra demonstrates strong governance structures with board independence at 82% (9 of 11 directors independent), exceeding the 75% minimum. The company has no dual-class share structure, supporting equal voting rights. Board leadership is appropriately separated (Anders Gustafsson as Chair, William J. Burns as CEO; Michael A. Smith as Lead Independent Director). Board refreshment practices are robust, with five independent directors added since 2020 and third-party facilitated evaluation completed in 2025. Risk oversight is comprehensive, with dedicated committees overseeing cybersecurity, compensation, governance, and related-party transactions. However, annual lobbying spend is not disclosed, preventing assessment of climate-regulation or consumer-protection advocacy positions. No active antitrust, financial-fraud, or material consumer-safety proceedings are disclosed in provided documents. Stock ownership guidelines are in place (CEO: 6x base salary; executives: 4x; directors: 5x board retainer). Overall, Zebra's governance framework is well-designed and transparent; the primary gap is lack of disclosed lobbying expenditures and absence of explicit anti-greenwashing or anti-shareholder-lawsuit commitments.

These are Missionomics' own editorial scores — directional signals built from disclosed facts under a published method, not certifications or definitive ratings of Zebra Technologies Corporation. Coverage and confidence vary by data point, and figures can lag real-world changes. Read the full Methodology for sourcing, scoring, and correction details — or open Zebra Technologies Corporation in the app for interactive charts and portfolio building.

More in Technology