Consumer Staples
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
Data as of July 7, 2026
Environment story
P&G discloses enterprise sustainability ambitions and ties a portion of executive incentive compensation to an ESG Scorecard covering Scope 1/2/3 emissions, packaging circularity, water restoration, and responsible sourcing. However, the reviewed filings do not disclose granular Scope 1/2/3 emissions figures or year-over-year trend data, and a shareholder proposal highlights lagging progress on virgin-plastic reduction and flexible-packaging goals. This is descriptive research output, not investment advice.
Criticisms on file
-
Shareholder proposal (As You Sow) alleges P&G lags on its 2030 packaging goals, citing a 3% increase in total corporate virgin plastic use (2020-2021) and that approximately 19% of P&G packaging remains flexible (largely non-recyclable) plastic.Source: PG_proxy.txt — Item 5 Shareholder Proposal, 2025 DEF 14A
Disclosed initiatives
-
ESG Scorecard Linked to Executive CompensationThe Compensation & Leadership Development Committee maintains an ESG Scorecard incorporating Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emission reduction, consumer packaging circularity, water restoration in priority areas, and responsible sourcing of palm oil and certified fiber, contributing to the Total Company Factor used in NEO bonus calculations.Ties a portion of pay-for-performance metrics to sustainability progress; FY2024-25 ESG Factor was assessed at 100%.
-
Packaging Innovation & Circularity ReviewThe Innovation & Technology Committee reviewed packaging innovation strategy including environmentally sustainable and circular packaging attributes and cross-industry collaboration on novel materials.
-
2030 Sustainability AmbitionsCompany states it has met or is progressing toward most 2030 environmental ambitions, with some areas raised and others acknowledged as constrained by available scalable infrastructure/technology.
Social story
Reviewed filings show no disclosed CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio exceeding 200:1, no documented union-suppression activity or major strikes within the last 24 months, and board-level diversity metrics above the 30% threshold (36% female, 50% racially/ethnically diverse director nominees). No supply-chain human-rights audit findings were present in the reviewed documents. This is descriptive research output, not investment advice.
Criticisms on file
No material criticisms on file for this pillar.
Disclosed initiatives
-
Gender and Racial Pay Equity AuditsC&LD Committee reviewed results of the Company's most recent gender and racial pay equity audits, which were reported as positive, as part of its global commitment to fair pay.
-
Leadership Pipeline & Talent DevelopmentC&LD Committee conducts in-depth reviews of next-generation talent across business units, markets, and functions to build leadership pipeline diversity and depth.
-
Workplace Safety OversightGovernance & Public Responsibility Committee reviewed global workplace safety with the Chief Product Supply Officer, including historical results, trends, and mitigation efforts.
Governance story
P&G maintains a single-class share structure, board independence of 85.7% (12 of 14 nominees), and an active Lead Director model with regular executive sessions. No dual-class voting structure, active antitrust/consumer-safety/financial-fraud proceedings, or shareholder litigation over climate proposals were identified in the reviewed filings. This is descriptive research output, not investment advice.
Criticisms on file
No material criticisms on file for this pillar.
Disclosed initiatives
-
Ethics & Compliance ProgramEthics & Compliance Committee, comprised of CEO, CFO, COO, CHRO, and CLO, oversees the Company's Ethics & Compliance Program under Audit Committee oversight; compliance factors into executive compensation decisions.
-
Independent Lead Director & Executive SessionsAn active and autonomous Lead Director leads regular executive sessions of independent directors and facilitates cross-committee feedback.
-
Recoupment (Clawback) PolicyCompany maintains recoupment policies to claw back compensation in the event of a financial restatement.
These are Missionomics' own editorial scores — directional signals built from disclosed facts under a published method, not certifications or definitive ratings of The Procter & Gamble Company. Coverage and confidence vary by data point, and figures can lag real-world changes. Read the full Methodology for sourcing, scoring, and correction details — or open The Procter & Gamble Company in the app for interactive charts and portfolio building.
Browse Companies · Methodology · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · Back to Missionomics