Missionomics Back to app

Utilities

Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA)

Utilities $6.4B market cap

Data as of July 16, 2026

Environment
72.00
People
82.00
Leadership
75.00

Environment story

Ormat operates a renewable energy portfolio centered on geothermal baseload power, a significant environmental strength. However, the company's environmental score reflects material risks: Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions data are not disclosed in filings; Scope 3 emissions (supply-chain and product-lifecycle) are undisclosed, triggering a 15-point deduction. The company has not articulated a formal net-zero target year or net-zero commitment, resulting in a 15-point deduction. Environmental controversies include geothermal reservoir depletion at multiple facilities (Olkaria, Sarulla, Brawley impairments), water-stress litigation risks in arid regions, and hazardous-substance handling (butane, pentane) at power plants without detailed remediation disclosures. The 2021 lawsuit by Center for Biological Diversity and Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe challenging Dixie Meadows approval reflects indigenous-rights tensions. Positive factors include 100% renewable electricity generation from owned assets, active investment in next-generation EGS technology (Sage Geosystems $25M, SLB partnership), and expansion into battery storage and solar. No evidence of carbon-offset dependency in lieu of operational reductions.

Criticisms on file

  • Geothermal Reservoir Depletion and Impairments: Olkaria complex (Kenya) experienced reduction in generation due to lower well-field performance; Sarulla complex (joint venture, Indonesia) reduction due to wellfield issues and equipment failures; Brawley plant (California) recorded non-cash impairment due to continuous wellfield issues and electricity generation lower than designed capacity
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factors, Item 1A; MD&A discussion of Property, Plant & Equipment impairments
  • Water Supply Risk and Environmental Compliance: Company acknowledges critical water dependency for cooling-tower operations at multiple facilities; indicates monitoring of water-stress risks. Risk factor notes that increased water restrictions, permit impacts, or supply scarcity could reduce generation and profitability
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Operations could be adversely impacted by climate change and other extreme weather events'
  • Hazardous Substance Liability: Power plants use butane, pentane, industrial lubricants and other classified hazardous substances. Company faces potential liability for investigation, removal, and cleanup of releases, including joint-and-several liability under federal/state law, regardless of source or timing of release
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Could be exposed to significant liability for violations of hazardous substances laws'
  • Indigenous Rights and Environmental Litigation: 2021 lawsuit filed by Center for Biological Diversity and Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe sought to revoke BLM approval of Dixie Meadows geothermal project; later closed without prejudice. No assurance that Dixie Meadows can be developed as originally intended
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Business development activities may not be successful'; environmental permits litigation discussion
  • BLM Solar Permit Impasse: BLM has not issued new permits or renewed certain permits for solar facilities, solar+storage, or solar auxiliary installations on U.S. federal lands where ORA applied. Creates regulatory uncertainty and may materially limit project development on federal lands
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'The absence of new or renewed BLM permits for solar PV projects on U.S. federal lands could impair our development activities'
  • Subsurface Impacts and Ground Deformation: Company notes that fluid injection pressures from geothermal operations can cause ground subsidence or inflation; if uncontrolled, can adversely affect farming operations and infrastructure near surface. Requires active management and stabilization
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Our exploration, development, and operation of geothermal energy resources are subject to geological risks'

Disclosed initiatives

  • Geothermal Baseload Portfolio
    Operates 22+ geothermal power plants across U.S. and international markets; 70.1% of 2025 revenues from electricity generation. All geothermal generation is carbon-free baseload power.
    Eliminates operational Scope 1 carbon from power generation; high capacity factors vs. intermittent renewables
  • Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Investment
    $25M Series B investment in Sage Geosystems (January 2026); Strategic agreement to pilot advanced pressure geothermal at existing Ormat facility; SLB partnership announced October 2025 for EGS development and commercialization
    Positions company to expand geothermal resource base to non-hydrothermal locations; potential geographic and capacity expansion
  • Energy Storage and Solar Expansion
    Acquired Hoku solar+storage facility (30MW solar, 30MW/120MWh BESS, Hawaii, $80.5M, January 2026); Arrowleaf hybrid project (42MW solar, 35MW/140MWh BESS) reached COD December 2025; Lower Rio storage (60MW/120MWh, Texas) operational September 2025; Israeli tolling agreements for 300MW/1200MWh storage (February 2025)
    Diversifies portfolio beyond geothermal; integrates renewables with grid-stabilizing storage; 8.0% of 2025 revenues from Energy Storage segment

Social story

Ormat's social score reflects a moderate-to-strong profile with limited disclosed data. The company operates in 7+ countries with mixed labor-relations environments; no active union-suppression litigation or major strikes within 24 months are reported, supporting a neutral-to-positive union standing. CEO-to-worker pay ratio is not disclosed, preventing a definitive assessment but triggering no deduction absent evidence of ratio >200:1. Leadership diversity (women in executive/board roles) is not quantified in the 10-K, indicating potential data gaps; absent specific disclosure of <30% female representation, no deduction applied. The company faces persistent labor-market challenges (geothermal operations require specialized skills; acknowledged in risk factors) and has experienced labor disputes at some facilities (e.g., collective-bargaining risks outlined). Supply-chain ethics: no cobalt, lithium, or rare-earth extraction by ORA directly; however, Energy Storage segment relies on imported batteries from China (tariff exposure noted). No modern-slavery statement, conflict-minerals policy, or living-wage commitment disclosed. International operations in Kenya, Guatemala, Honduras, Indonesia, and Turkey present geopolitical and labor-relations risks (political instability, civil unrest, terrorist threats). The company reports no major human-rights controversies or NLRB actions in source documents.

Criticisms on file

  • International Geopolitical and Civil-Unrest Exposure: Kenya operations threatened by recurring terrorist attacks (upsurge since 2019); Guatemala experienced anti-government protests (2023-2024); Honduras faces political/economic instability and currency restrictions. Company notes these risks could result in curtailing operations or material impairment
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Political, economic and other conditions in the emerging economies where we operate'
  • Israel-Based Management and Production Risk: Majority of senior management and main Product segment manufacturing located in Israel (~26 miles from Gaza Strip); supplies/shipping via Port of Ashdod. Military conflicts, reserve duty call-ups, and business-partner hesitation due to Israel perception could disrupt operations and growth plans. Middle East wars (2023-2025) already caused operational disruptions
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Conditions in and around Israel, where the majority of our senior management and our main product segment production and manufacturing facilities are located, may adversely affect our operations'
  • Supply-Chain Labor and Ethics Gaps: Energy Storage segment relies 95% on imports, primarily batteries from China, subject to tariff volatility and supply-chain concentration. No disclosed audits, modern-slavery statements, or conflict-minerals policies for battery suppliers. Lithium and cobalt sourcing not addressed in filings
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Our investments and profitability in Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) may be negatively affected...expanded trade restrictions'; MD&A on tariffs and supply-chain dependencies
  • Undisclosed CEO Pay and Diversity Metrics: No CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio, executive diversity (gender/race), or board diversity percentages disclosed in 10-K. Limits assessment of pay equity and inclusive leadership
    Source: ORA 10-K filing; no executive-compensation disclosure proxies or DEI statements provided in source documents

Disclosed initiatives

  • International Labor Compliance and Management
    Operations in Kenya, Honduras, Guatemala, Indonesia, Guadeloupe, Turkey, and other jurisdictions subject to varying labor standards. Company acknowledges risks from 'selective enforcement of laws, lack of judicial independence, and high discretion of authorities' in foreign jurisdictions. No explicit labor-rights certification or third-party audit disclosed
    Exposure to inconsistent labor regulation and enforcement; compliance costs and reputational risk in high-risk geographies
  • Workforce Challenges and Recruitment
    Company acknowledges 'labor market risk' and 'recruit appropriate employees and labor market challenges' as material risks. Specialized geothermal and product-segment expertise required; geographic dispersion increases recruitment friction
    May limit growth strategy execution; potential wage-inflation pressure in tight labor markets
  • Safety and Operations Risk Management
    Risk factors identify occupational hazards: hazardous substances (butane, pentane), equipment failures, earthquakes, volcanic activity. No specific safety-management certifications or incident-rate disclosures provided in 10-K
    Employee safety contingent on geological/operational risk mitigation; transparency gaps on safety metrics

Governance story

Ormat's governance score reflects moderate strength with material concerns. Board independence percentage is not disclosed, preventing precise assessment; no indication of dual-class voting structure or supermajority founder control exists in filings, supporting single-class equity governance (no deduction). Lobbying expenditures are not quantified; no evidence of active climate-deregulation or consumer-protection lobbying is disclosed. However, the company faces significant regulatory and antitrust exposures: (1) PURPA/Qualifying Facility status risk—loss of QF designation would subject domestic plants to full FERC rate regulation and potential rate reductions or refund obligations; (2) BLM permitting uncertainty—lack of new solar permits on federal lands creates regulatory ambiguity and delays; (3) FERC regulatory changes—proposed modifications to PURPA mandatory-purchase obligations and QF thresholds would materially harm revenues; (4) Cybersecurity and data-privacy compliance—evolving FERC, state, and federal regimes (California, etc.) create increasing compliance costs and enforcement risk; (5) No documented SEC consent decrees, material antitrust proceedings, or major privacy fines reported in 10-K, but regulatory uncertainty around climate and energy policy (Trump administration's anti-ESG stance, EPA GHG-authority rollback) creates forward-looking governance risk. Positively, the company demonstrates engagement with regulatory change (OBBBA tax-credit strategies, renewable energy advocacy) and no shareholder-litigation history disclosed.

Criticisms on file

  • PURPA and Qualifying Facility Status Risk: Loss of QF status would subject domestic plants to full FERC rate regulation, potential rate reductions, and refund liability. FERC has authority to modify QF rules or lift mandatory-purchase obligations. California utilities already waived mandatory-purchase obligation for QF projects >20MW. Material financial exposure if PURPA authority modified or QF status lost
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'If any of our domestic power plants loses its current Qualifying Facility status under PURPA...our domestic operations could be adversely affected'
  • BLM Permitting Uncertainty and Regulatory Gridlock: BLM has not issued new permits or renewed certain permits for solar, solar+storage, or solar-auxiliary installations on federal lands where ORA applied. No formal cancellations but 'lack of new approvals and renewals creates significant regulatory uncertainty.' May materially limit project development, increase costs, result in site-control loss, and delay revenue generation
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'The absence of new or renewed BLM permits for solar PV projects on U.S. federal lands could impair our development activities'
  • Anti-ESG Policy and Regulatory Ambiguity: Trump administration early-2025 executive orders suggest positive posture toward geothermal but 'impact...remains unclear, and we cannot currently make any assurance.' EPA recent determination that it lacks authority to regulate certain GHG emissions and would no longer stand behind prior findings that GHG emissions are harmful. Creates regulatory uncertainty and potential for reduction in renewable-energy incentives
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'We could be impacted by regulatory and other responses to climate change and other sustainability-related matters'
  • FERC Regulatory Modifications and Rate-Review Risk: FERC has authority to prospectively lift mandatory-purchase obligation of utilities under PURPA if utility operates in 'workably competitive market.' Modification of QF thresholds (potential reduction below 5MW or elimination) would materially affect revenue streams. Existing PPAs protected but future projects and renewals at risk
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'If a domestic power plant were to lose its Qualifying Facility status under PURPA...or if amendments to PURPA are enacted that substantially reduce the benefits'
  • Cybersecurity and Data-Privacy Compliance Evolution: Evolving FERC, federal, state, and local cybersecurity/data-protection regimes (California, etc.) create 'ever-increasing public scrutiny and escalating levels of capital expenditures, regulatory enforcement, sanctions and fines.' Company notes to date no material cyber-incidents but acknowledges breach/attack attempts ongoing. Enforcement risk and compliance-cost escalation
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'A cyber-incident, cyber security breach, severe natural event or physical attack on our operational networks'
  • Environmental Lawsuit and Permit Challenge: 2021 litigation by Center for Biological Diversity and Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe challenging BLM approval of Dixie Meadows geothermal project; closed without prejudice, indicating potential for renewal. Reflects governance risk from environmental/indigenous-rights challenges to project development
    Source: ORA 10-K Risk Factor: 'Environmental permits and governmental approvals may also be delayed...A lawsuit was filed by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe in 2021'

Disclosed initiatives

  • Regulatory Compliance and Energy-Policy Adaptation
    Company actively monitors and responds to evolving U.S. energy regulation (PURPA, FERC, renewable standards). In response to OBBBA (enacted July 2025), company evaluating tax-credit monetization strategies for geothermal (100% PTC/ITC through 2033, declining thereafter). Adapting project development timelines to comply with FEOC battery-sourcing requirements
    Proactive positioning to capture tax incentives; risk exposure to future policy reversals or rate reductions
  • International Governance and Compliance
    Company subject to FCPA, anti-corruption laws, data-privacy regulations (GDPR, California Consumer Privacy Act, FERC cybersecurity standards). Acknowledges risks from 'selective enforcement' and 'high discretion' in foreign jurisdictions; maintains political-risk insurance for select countries
    Compliance costs and reputational exposure in high-risk geographies; insurance coverage gaps acknowledged
  • Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Security
    Subject to FERC cybersecurity requirements for operational technology and critical energy infrastructure. Acknowledges evolving federal, state, and local data-protection/privacy regimes. To date, no material cyber-incident impact reported; maintains cyber-liability insurance (coverage adequacy uncertain)
    Increasing capital expenditures and compliance costs for IT/OT security; regulatory enforcement risk if breaches occur
  • Shareholder Engagement and M&A Oversight
    Company pursuing acquisitions to expand geothermal and storage portfolios (e.g., Blue Mountain $88.7M, Hoku $80.5M, 2025-2026). Integration risks acknowledged in risk factors; no shareholder-proposal opposition or litigation disclosed
    Integration execution risk; potential goodwill impairment if acquired assets underperform

These are Missionomics' own editorial scores — directional signals built from disclosed facts under a published method, not certifications or definitive ratings of Ormat Technologies, Inc.. Coverage and confidence vary by data point, and figures can lag real-world changes. Read the full Methodology for sourcing, scoring, and correction details — or open Ormat Technologies, Inc. in the app for interactive charts and portfolio building.

Open Ormat Technologies, Inc. in Missionomics

More in Utilities

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) Southern Company (The) Series 2 (SOJE) The Southern Company (SO) The Southern Company (SOMN) Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)

Browse Companies · Methodology · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · Back to Missionomics