Industrials
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)
Data as of July 6, 2026
Environment story
Caterpillar's 10-K discloses no quantified Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions data, no renewable-electricity percentage, and no formal net-zero target year, triggering deductions for undisclosed Scope 3 accounting and absence of a credible net-zero commitment. The filing acknowledges exposure to 'increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations' and potential liability for hazardous-substance remediation, but no specific, sourced water/toxic-waste controversy with quantified severity is present in the provided documents, so no additional controversy deduction was applied. No verified physical decarbonization infrastructure investments (e.g., dedicated renewable generation, electrified manufacturing) were disclosed in these sources. This is informational research only and does not constitute financial advice.
Criticisms on file
-
Ongoing asbestos-related product liability claims and other environmental/legal matters referenced under litigation risk factors.Source: CAT_10k.txt - Item 1A Risk Factors, Legal & Regulatory Risks
Disclosed initiatives
No disclosed initiatives on file for this pillar.
Social story
The provided filings do not disclose a CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio figure, workforce turnover rate, or supply-chain human-rights audit results, so no rule-based deductions were applied for these undisclosed metrics. The 10-K acknowledges general risk from union relations and potential strikes/work stoppages across multiple countries but does not document any active union-suppression activity or strike within the past 24 months. Board-level diversity (50% women, 30% ethnic/racial) is disclosed in the proxy, which is at or above the 30% threshold, so no deduction applies; comparable executive/technical leadership diversity figures were not provided. This is informational research only and does not constitute financial advice.
Criticisms on file
No material criticisms on file for this pillar.
Disclosed initiatives
No disclosed initiatives on file for this pillar.
Governance story
Caterpillar maintains a single-class share structure (no dual-class voting), and 9 of 10 director nominees are independent (90%), both above the rubric thresholds, so no deductions apply on these dimensions. The proxy references a 'Political Contributions and Lobbying' section, but no lobbying expenditure figures or explicit anti-regulatory lobbying activity are provided in the source text, so no lobbying deduction was applied. No active antitrust, consumer-safety, or financial-fraud regulatory proceeding against Caterpillar is detailed in these documents; a patent-infringement lawsuit filed by Bobcat against Caterpillar is noted as an active legal matter but does not meet the antitrust/consumer-safety/fraud criteria. This is informational research only and does not constitute financial advice.
Criticisms on file
-
Bobcat filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Caterpillar (referenced in shareholder proposal supporting statement).Source: CAT_proxy.txt - Shareholder Proposal 4 supporting statement
Disclosed initiatives
-
Clawback PolicyCompany maintains an executive compensation clawback policy per governance highlights table.
-
Anti-Hedging and Pledging PoliciesDirectors and executive officers are subject to policies prohibiting hedging and pledging of company stock.
-
Majority Voting & Proxy AccessAnnual election of directors with majority voting standard and shareholder proxy access rights.
These are Missionomics' own editorial scores — directional signals built from disclosed facts under a published method, not certifications or definitive ratings of Caterpillar Inc.. Coverage and confidence vary by data point, and figures can lag real-world changes. Read the full Methodology for sourcing, scoring, and correction details — or open Caterpillar Inc. in the app for interactive charts and portfolio building.
Browse Companies · Methodology · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · Back to Missionomics